Source document

BGE 145 IV 114 (Urteil 6B_1314/2016, 6B_1318/2016 vom 10. Oktober 2018)

Schweizerisches Bundesgericht (Swiss Federal Supreme Court) · Court · 10 Oct 2018 · Switzerland

Has everything in it been taken?

CompleteReviewed 8 Oct 2026

Reviewed. Everything in it that belongs in the tables has been taken.

What the document holds

Swiss Federal Supreme Court leading decision BGE 145 IV 114 (10 Oct 2018, excerpt): Rudolf Elmer (anonymised "X.") case history (employment with Julius Bär in Zurich and the Cayman Islands subsidiary 1987-2002; leaks to tax authorities, Cash magazine and WikiLeaks; Zurich District Court 2011: 240 day-fines of CHF 30 suspended; 2015: 300 day-fines of CHF 150 suspended; High Court 2016: acquittal on bank secrecy, 14 months suspended for threats and forgery with 220 days served; prosecution sought 36 months) and the legal reasoning that he was not an employee or agent of a Swiss bank under Art. 47 Banking Act (pre-2004 penalty up to six months or CHF 50,000 fine; now up to three years). No reward programme (Switzerland has none) and no programme numbers. The case row, with these sentences in its summary and notes, was already in the data; nothing to add.

What it supports

1 row on this site come from this document. Each one opens with the page and the exact words.

About the document

What it covers Rudolf Elmer bank-secrecy case: lower-court sentences and Federal Supreme Court ruling

Notes Published leading decision (anonymised: the defendant is 'X.'); converted from Latin-1 to UTF-8. Elmer is named in law.ch's report of the same ruling.

Source id che-bger-bge-145-iv-114-2018 · accessed 3 Oct 2026