Source document
Qui Tam: The False Claims Act and Related Federal Statutes (R40785, updated April 26, 2021)
Has everything in it been taken?
PartialReviewed 8 Oct 2026
Reviewed. Some of what it contains has knowingly not been taken yet.
What is left
Decide whether the many court rulings discussed on pp. 15-45 (e.g. Stevens 2000, Rockwell 2007, Eisenstein 2009, Graham County 2005/2010, Kellogg Brown & Root 2015, Rigsby 2016) should be events; only Cochise (2019) was added. Decide whether customs informer awards (19 U.S.C. 1619, up to 25% of net recovery, fn 31) merit a programme; if so, record that rule from p. 5 (PDF p. 9).
What the document holds
CRS Report R40785 "Qui Tam: The False Claims Act and Related Federal Statutes" (Charles Doyle, updated 26 Apr 2021, 62 pp.): history of qui tam in England and the colonies; contemporary federal qui tam statutes; FCA history (1863, 1943, 1986, 2009, 2010 amendments); current law (who may sue, first-to-file and public-disclosure bars, liability elements, retaliation, penalties $5,000-$10,000 adjusted and treble damages, relator shares 15-25%/25-30%/max 10%, procedure: seal, 60-day intervention window, 6/3/10-year limits); Indian protection qui tam (25 U.S.C. 201, half to informer); constitutional challenges; statute text appendix (pp. 45-56 printed). Numbers: FCA recoveries 1986-2009 over $20 billion, over $40 billion since then, over $3 billion in FY2019, and a quoted "$62 billion ... $7.3 billion to whistleblowers". Already recorded: 5 rules (1863-1986 shares, 1943 bar) and 4 events. Added 5 observations, 9 rules, a proposed programme for 25 U.S.C. 201 with 2 rules, 4 events and 3 cases (Marcus v. Hess, Drakeford v. Tuomey, Tyson v. Amerigroup, the ex rel. cases with printed amounts). Not recorded: colonial and English informer shares (history, no programme); DOJ fraud estimate of 1-10% of the federal budget ($10-100 billion a year, fn 57: not a programme number); FCA judgments in cases not identified as qui tam (Aleff $1.3m, Bourseau $15.6m, Mackby $729,454.92, Eghbal $5.851m, Byrd $1.575m); customs informer awards up to 25% (19 U.S.C. 1619) and other moiety statutes (no programme in the dataset); the 60-day seal/intervention period and first-to-file bar (no rule type).
What it supports
32 rows on this site come from this document. Each one opens with the page and the exact words.
5 numbers3 cases2 programmes14 rules8 events
Numbers (5)
- Awards paid (amount)USD 7.3 billionto 2020 · CRS 2021Reported by othersUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Total recoveriesLimit: USD 62 billionto 2020 · CRS 2021Reported by othersUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Total recoveriesLimit: USD 3 billionFY2019 · CRS 2021Reported by othersUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Total recoveriesLimit: USD 40 billion2009 to 2021-04 · CRS 2021Reported by othersUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Total recoveriesLimit: USD 20 billion1986-2009 · CRS 2021Reported by othersUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
Cases and awards (3)
- Hess1943 · Money collected USD 315,100.91ReportedUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Amerigroup Illinois, Inc.2007 · Money collected USD 334,000,000ReportedUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Tuomey2014 · Money collected USD 234,400,000ReportedUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
Programmes (2)
Reward rules (14)
- Bar on claims based on already public informationsuits based on information already in the government's possessionYes23 Dec 1943 – 26 Oct 1986 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Bar on claims based on already public informationsuits where substantially the same allegations were publicly disclosed, unless the relator is an original source (after PPACA 2010)YesDate not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharegovernment does not take over the case25%23 Dec 1943 – 26 Oct 1986 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharegovernment takes up and litigates the case10%23 Dec 1943 – 26 Oct 1986 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award shareall successful qui tam suits50%2 Mar 1863 – 22 Dec 1943 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharegovernment does not participate (relator litigates alone)30%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharegovernment takes over the litigation25%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharegovernment takes over and the claim is based primarily on public information10%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Minimum award shareall successful qui tam suits50%2 Mar 1863 – 22 Dec 1943 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Minimum award sharegovernment does not participate (relator litigates alone)25%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Minimum award sharegovernment takes over the litigation15%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Time limit to file a claimretaliation action under 31 U.S.C. 3730(h)3 yearsSince 21 Jul 2010 · CRS 2021United States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Maximum award sharepenalty recovered when the informer sues first50%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · Indian protection qui tam
- Minimum award sharepenalty recovered when the informer sues first (all to the United States if it sues first)50%Date not stated · CRS 2021United States · Indian protection qui tam
Timeline (8)
- Supreme Court: FCA discovery extension applies to relators whether or not the government intervenes (Cochise)2019LegalUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Patent false-marking qui tam replaced (Leahy-Smith America Invents Act)2011ClosureUnited States
- Dodd-Frank adds 3-year limit for FCA retaliation claims21 Jul 2010Rule changeUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 amends the FCA20 May 2009Rule changeUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Second Indian-protection qui tam provision (25 U.S.C. 81) removed2000ClosureUnited States
- 1943 amendments curtail qui tam23 Dec 1943Rule changeUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- False Claims Act enacted (Civil War)2 Mar 1863LaunchUnited States · False Claims Act qui tam provisions
- Indian protection qui tam provision (25 U.S.C. 201) enacted1834LaunchUnited States · Indian protection qui tam
About the document
What it covers Legislative history of the FCA: 1863 Act (relators got half), 1943 amendments (shares cut to max 25%/10%, government-knowledge bar), 1986, 2009 and 2010 amendments.
Notes Author Charles Doyle. crsreports.congress.gov returned 403 to scripted download; copy taken from EveryCRSReport mirror https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/2021-04-26_R40785_4c2f57934fa8c0be16f5e0e5f76c0539e54ac8f9.pdf (identical CRS PDF).
Source id usa-crs-r40785-2021 · accessed 3 Oct 2026