Source document

United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., No. 21-1052, 599 U.S. ___ (2023) (slip opinion)

Supreme Court of the United States · Court · 16 Jun 2023 · United States

Has everything in it been taken?

CompleteReviewed 8 Oct 2026

Reviewed. Everything in it that belongs in the tables has been taken.

What the document holds

US Supreme Court slip opinion, United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., No. 21-1052, decided 16 Jun 2023 (37 pp.: syllabus, opinion of the Court by Justice Kagan, concurrence by Justice Kavanaugh, dissent by Justice Thomas, appendix with 31 U.S.C. 3730 text). Holds that the government may move to dismiss a qui tam suit whenever it has intervened, and that Rule 41(a) governs such motions. Describes the FCA scheme (relator share up to 30%; 60-day seal; later intervention for good cause), the facts of Polansky's 2012 qui tam suit, and (dissent) the 15-25% and 25-30% ranges. No statistics. The event was already recorded; added the relator-share rules as the Court and the dissent state them, and the Polansky suit as a case (dismissed, no recovery).

What it supports

7 rows on this site come from this document. Each one opens with the page and the exact words.

About the document

What it covers Government's power to dismiss qui tam suits after intervening; Thomas dissent and Kavanaugh concurrence on Article II

Notes Downloaded directly from supremecourt.gov (the _5h26 URL tried in wave 1 was wrong).

Source id usa-scotus-polansky-2023 · accessed 5 Oct 2026